From each of the furniture needs, the chair could be paramount. While most of the other items (save the bed) are designed to support objects, the chair supports our human form. The term chair is looked upon here in the wider sense, from stool to throne to complex kinds like the bench and sofa, which can be seen as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not evidently distinuishable.
The social history of the chair is as exciting as its history as art and craft. The chair is not simply a physical support or aesthetic object; it can also be a symbol of social ranking. At the past royal courts there were social connotations between sitting on a chair with arms, sitting on a chair with a back but without arms, or worse having to make do with a stool. In the last century, the director’s and/or manager’s chair has been regarded as iconic of superior rank, and even in democratic government meeting the speaker sits on a raised platform.
As its furniture creation, the chair encompasses a wealth of various makes. There are chairs designed to match man’s age and physical form (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to connotate his rank in society (the executive chair, the throne). During the olden days there were chairs for births (birth chairs); in the 20th century, there have been chairs for ending life (the electric chair). We make chairs with one, two, three, and four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We have chairs that can be folded up, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Contemporary lifestyle has designated new chairs for automobiles and aircraft. Every one of these chair forms have been changed to suit to changing human desires. From its unique association with man, the chair appears to its full significance only when in employ. Although it is irrelevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a set of drawers if there are things inside or not, a chair is really understood and fairly regarded by a person sitting in it, for chair and sitter complement one another. Thus the various limbs of the chair were labeled likened to the parts of a human body: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the original job of the chair is to support the body, its worth is valued generally by how suitably it does fulfill this practical use. Within the design of a chair, the maker is restricted with the static rules and principal measurements. Through these regulations, however, the chair designer has marvellous freedom.
The history of the chair covered a period of several thousand years. There are cultures that held unique chair types, as expressions of the principal endeavour in the industries of technique and art. Within these civilisations, particular mention can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the reigns of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the result of expert scheme, are today a finding from discoveries made in tombs. The first of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The classical Egyptian chair has four legs structured like those of a chosen animal, a curved seat, with a sloping back supported above vertical stretchers. From this design a stable triangular form was created. There was in our knowledge no notable difference from the design of Egyptian thrones and chairs for ordinary populace. The real change exists in the intricacy of its ornamentation, in the particulars of more valuable inlays. The Egyptian folding stool most probably was developed as an easily packed seat for officers. As a camp stool that chair persevered during much later times. But the stool also then was made for the character of a ceremonial seat, its original task as a folding stool ignored or forgotten. This can now be observed, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, formed in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are made in the construction of folding stools but can’t be folded because the seats are worked from wood. The plain manufacture of the folding stool, made of two frames that cycle on metal bolts and hold a seat of leather or fabric held between them, reappears somewhat later during the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The better recognised of this kind is the folding stool, made of ashwood, which can now be seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The significant Greek chair, the klismos, is recognised not from any ancient item still existing but as in a variety of pictorial evidence. The best known is the klismos posited on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial area near Athens (c. 410 BC). It is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of those legs can be seen. These unique legs were thought to have been executed with bent wood and were in that case put under great pressure with the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat had to be therefore very stable and were particularly pointed out.
The Romans adopted the Greek style; some casts of seated Romans are designs of a more heavyset and in appearance somewhat more crudely designed klismos. Both kinds, the light or the heavy, were brought back in the Classicist epoch. The klismos style can be seen in French Empire chairs, in English Regency, and in some kinds of profound originality around Denmark and Sweden around 1800.
China
The ancestry of the chair in China cannot be traced as long as the ancestry of chairs in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed series of drawings and works of art had been preserved, with images of the insides and outer parts of Chinese buildings and the furniture. Another preservation from the 16th century are some chairs constructed from wood or lacquered wood, that display an astonishing similarity to pictures of older chairs.
As were the designs in Egypt, there existed two standard chair forms in China: a chair that had four legs and a folding stool. The four-legged chair can be designed both with and without arms though never missing its square seat and straight stiles (straight side supports) to support the back. In one kind, it has been seen, the stiles had been marginally curved on top of the arms to suit the shape of the S-shaped back splat (the basic upright of its chairback). All three areas are mortised into the yoke-like top rail. While the design of this back splat exercised a foundation for English chairs during the Queen Anne period, wooden items that would merely to a limited limit support corner joints (and furthermore were loose as a result) signify an element signatory to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which ends about the rounded staves. All members are round in section or have rounded edges—references as may be to the bamboo tradition. The seat is unpleasant to sit in and may have had a plaited seat. These chairs demanded of the sitter to stay stiff and upright; for when too much weight is placed on the back, the chair has a tendency to fall. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this epoch armchairs presumably were kept only for older members of the family, for they were respected greatly.
The Chinese folding stool is thought to have been brought to China from the West. It is akin so very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a difference in that the top rail is prettily joined to the two legs of the stool by use of a curved member, which is more often than not possessing metal mounts. From a Western viewpoint the resulting effect of both of these furniture styles is stylized. The construction and decoration elements are combined in a manner that is all at once naïve and refined. The patchwork appearance is an outcome of the fact that the individual items do not seem to have been adjoined by means of either glue or screws, but are mortised into one another and locked into position in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain of the 17th century also had its name on the chair. Works of art show a kind of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between, stitched to bring up a pattern of little pads. The front board and a similar board at the back could be folded after unscrewing some tiny iron hooks. Therefore the chair was a readily portable piece of furniture when traveling which, at the same era, gave the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered type of chair can be evidenced in engravings of the interiors of affluent Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this kind of chair can also be seen in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won favour, it is not believed that the design actually began in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of slender measurements; they are sometimes baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is clearly a bourgeois piece of furniture and was made in impressive amounts, as surmisable from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which an entire row of such chairs lined up against a wall. The form asserts itself by its elegant proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric framed with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of styles—that is to say, as developed in Paris around 1750—spread over most of Europe and has been imitated or copied in the mid-20th century. The design owes such popularity to a combination of leisure and delicacy. The seat conforms to the human body and permits a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Usually the seat and back are upholstered, and there are little upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are constructed solidly on craftsmanlike practices despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations thereof have wood of fairly thick measurements; but every member is deeply molded, all extra wood has been cut away, and finer designs would be further embellished with very delicate and decorative engravings. The wood can be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry can be used for all the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is occasionally used in place of upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more varied in design than the French. The French manner for stylistic uniformity, which lead from the aristocratic circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and became the favourite in large parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popularised and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
During the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper brands of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, hint that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office storage in Sydney contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content