From all the furniture needs, the chair might be the most important. While many other items (save for the bed) are devised to support objects, the chair supports a human form. The term chair is meant to be looked upon here in the widest sense, from stool to throne to derivative items for example a bench or sofa, which should be seen as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not overtly distinguished.
The social history of the chair is as exciting as its history as a creative art. The chair is not only a physical support and aesthetic item; it was also semiotic of social place. From the historical royal courts there were important differences between being seated on a chair with arms, on a chair with a back but without arms, or having to utilise a stool. Since the past century, a director’s and/or manager’s chair has developed an indicator of superior rank, as well as in democratic governments the speaker sits on an elevated floor.
As a furniture construction, the chair is utilised for a wealth of various makes. There are chairs designed to attend to man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to show his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). In the past there were chairs for birthing (birth chairs); since the 20th century, there have been chairs used to die in (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We make chairs that can be folded, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our modern lifestyle has designated new chairs for automobiles and aircraft. Every one of these chair shapes have been adapted to conform to evolving human uses. From its significant importance with man, the chair appears to its full purpose only when used. Although it makes no difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a set of drawers if there might be things inside or not, a chair is understood and fairly evaluated with a person using it, for chair and sitter need one another. Thus the individual areas of the chair were given labels like the elements of the human parts: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the fundamental role of your chair is to support our human body, its credit is judged firstly for how completely it measures up to this practical role. Within the creation of the chair, the carpenter is bound in certain static laws and principal measurements. In these restrictions, however, the chair designer has great freedom.
The history of the chair is an epoch of several thousand years. There is evidence of societies that had iconic chair shapes, as expressions of the leading craft in the industries of technique and art. In such societies, special mention can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lifetimes of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the upshot of skilled design, are now found from tomb discoveries. The first one of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The original Egyptian chair would have four legs formed akin to those of a chosen animal, a curved seat, and leading to a sloping back supported from vertical stretchers. From this a solid triangular design was made. There appeared to be no particular differentiation between the creation of Egyptian thrones and chairs for common people. The only difference exists in the decorative ornamentation, in the selection of pricey inlays. The Egyptian folding stool probably was manufactured for an easily packed seat for soldiers. As a camp stool that kind stayed during much later times. But the stool also then was created as the character of a ceremonial seat, its original task as a folding stool fast forgotten. This can from today’s evidence be observed, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, formed in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were constructed in the construction of folding stools but can’t be folded as the seats are formed with wood. The easy make of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that rotate on metal bolts and support a seat of leather or fabric held between them, came up some time later as the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most recognised of this form is the folding stool, made of ashwood, which is now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The unique Greek chair, the klismos, is found not with any ancient specimen still existing but as found in a wealth of pictorial evidence. The significant kind is the klismos depicted on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial place just out of Athens (c. 410 BC). This is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of which would be displayed. These creative legs were presumed to have been created from bent wood and were in that case had a large amount of pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints holding the legs to the frame of the seat would have been therefore super durable and were visibly denoted.
The Romans adopted the Greek design; existing models of seated Romans offer examples of a more heavyset and are a slightly crudely built klismos. Both features, light or heavy, were seen again during the Classicist epoch. The klismos design is evidenced in French Empire design, in English Regency, and in some brands of profound individuality around Denmark and Sweden around 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China can not be traced as far as the history of the chair in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an undamaged series of drawings and artworks was kept safe, showing the insides and outer parts of Chinese homes and the designs of furniture. Another preservation of the 16th century are some chairs crafted of wood or lacquered wood, that show an amazing likeness to images of past chairs.
As were the designs in Egypt, there existed two major chair designs in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. The four-legged chair has been designed both with or without arms however never without the square seat and straight stiles (vertical side supports) to support the back. In one form, it must be said, the stiles could be lightly curved above the arms in order to conform correctly to the form of the S-shaped back splat (the central upright of a chairback). Together, all three limbs were mortised into the yoke-like top rail. While the style of a back splat later had a foundation for English chairs from the Queen Anne period, wooden sections that would only to a limited capability reinforce corner joints (as well as being loose in the bargain) represent a design solely to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which finishes about the rounded staves. All the members are round in section or have rounded edges—an acknowledgement as may be to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not pleasant and may have had a plaited bottom. These chairs needed the sitter to be stiff and upright; if too much pressure is pushed on the back, the chair has a tendency to topple. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this epoch armchairs likely were reserved for elderly individuals in the family, for they were held in great esteem.
The Chinese folding stool is believed to have come to China from the West. It is not dissimilar so very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a dissimilarity in that the top rail is delicately fixed to the two legs of the stool by using a curved member, which is more often than not provided with metal mounts. From a Western point of view the resulting effect of both of these furniture forms is stylized. The constructive and decorative issues are combined in a style that is both naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is an upshot of the fact that the individual parts do not appear to have been constructed with either glue or screws, but had been mortised with one another and held in position in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also had its signature on the chair. Artworks project a kind of chair with a relatively crude wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in the layers, stitched to show up a pattern of little pads. The front board and a similar board in the back could be folded after unscrewing some small iron hooks. In this way the chair was a portable piece of furniture when traveling which, in the same period, had the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered type of chair can be seen in engravings of the interiors of affluent Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Although this kind of chair may also be seen in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not held that the design actually began in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair will be smooth, round in section, and of slender measurements; they are sometimes baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is clearly a bourgeois piece of furniture and was made in considerable numbers, as can be seen from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a row of these chairs lined up along a wall. The design asserts itself with its shapely proportions and expensive upholstery in gilt leather or fabric edged with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that is to say, as created in Paris around 1750—conquered most of Europe and has been imitated or copied in the mid-20th century. The model owes its popularity to a combination of leisure and charm. The seat adheres to the human body and grants a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Typically the seat and back are upholstered, and there are small upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are constructed on craftsmanlike practices even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them use wood of relatively thick dimensions; but all the members are deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been sanded away, and finer items might be further embellished with highly delicate and decorative carvings. The wood might be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry might be used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; crosshatched cane is occasionally used as an alternative to upholstery.
English chairs from the 18th century were more varied in design than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which disseminated from the aristocratic circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and found favour in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popularised and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper products of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, purport that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on reception desks in Sydney contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content