From each of the furniture pieces, the chair may be the primary one. While the majority of other pieces (apart from the bed) are created to support objects, the chair supports the human form. The term chair is meant to be said here in the largest sense, from stool to throne to derivative kinds including a bench or sofa, which may be looked upon as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously labeled.
The social history of the chair is as curious as its history as art and craft. The chair is not just a physical support and/or aesthetic piece; it historically was an indicator of social hierarchy. At the Medieval royal courts there were important distinctions between having a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but no arms, or worse having to squat on a stool. From the recent century, a director’s and/or manager’s chair has been seen as an indicator of superior rank, and in democratic government meeting the speaker sits on a raised platform.
In its furniture purpose, the chair is used for a wealth of various purposes. There are chairs created to attend to man’s age and physical form (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to indicate his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). From past times there were chairs used for birthing (birth chairs); during the 20th century, there have been chairs used to die in (the electric chair). We design chairs with one, two, three, and four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can make chairs that can be folded, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Contemporary lifestyle has demanded new chairs for use in automobiles and aircraft. All these chair kinds has adapted to suit to differing human desires. For its unique connection with man, the chair lives to its full purpose only when in employ. While it doesn’t make any difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a chest of drawers whether there are things inside or not, a chair is seen best and evaluated with a person sitting on it, for chair and sitter require one another. Thus the individual limbs of a chair were given labels according to the areas of a human form: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the simple role of the chair is to support the human body, its credit is judged generally by how completely it does fulfill this practical use. In the construction of a chair, the chair maker is restricted in certain static regulations and principal measurements. In these regulations, however, the chair creator has extensive freedom.
The history of the chair lasts over an epoch of several thousand years. There existed societies that had made iconic chair shapes, as seen of the leading endeavour in the industries of handling and creativity. In these such cultures, individual mention must be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the ascendancy of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the items of masterful make, are today known from findings made in tombs. First of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The typical Egyptian chair would have four legs shaped not unlike those of a chosen animal, a curved seat, and with a sloping back supported from vertical stretchers. From this a stable triangular construction was obtained. There was from our view no particular differentiation from the creation of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical non-royals. The simple change was in the intricacy of its ornamentation, in the particulars of expensive inlays. The Egyptian folding stool probably was developed as an easily packed seat for army officers. As a camp stool that type stayed around for much later periods of time. But the stool also was made for the use of a ceremonial seat, its mechanical task as a folding stool fast forgotten. This can today be seen, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay work and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were made in the form of folding stools but are not able to be folded as the seats are made out of wood. The simple construction of the folding stool, being of two frames that turn on metal bolts and hold a seat of leather or fabric fastened between them, then appeared but somewhat later as the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The better recognised of these is the folding stool, from ashwood, which is now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The significant Greek chair, the klismos, is found not from any ancient item still in form but as found in a wealth of pictorial objects. The significant kind is the klismos seen on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial ground by Athens (c. 410 BC). The klismos is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of them are seen. These curving legs were possibly executed with bent wood and were probably had to bear huge pressure with the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat would have had to be therefore extremely strong and were visibly indicated.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek design; some models of seated Romans show examples of a more heavyset and are a kind of more crudely constructed klismos. Both types, the light or heavy, were brought back in the Classicist time. The klismos influence is known in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in some special forms of marked originality in Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China cannot be followed as far back as in Egypt and Greece. From the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an undamaged collection of images and artworks had been preserved, with images of the interiors and exterior of Chinese households and the furniture. Kept also from the 16th century are a collection of chairs made of wood or lacquered wood, that show an amazing similarity to pictures of ancient chairs.
Just the same as in Egypt, there existed two major chair designs in China: a chair with four legs and a folding stool. That four-legged chair is designed both with or without arms although always with a square seat and straight stiles (vertical side supports) to hold up the back. In one image, though, the stiles could be delicately curved above the arms in order to suit the structure of the S-shaped back splat (the basic upright of its back). Together, the three limbs are mortised on the yoke-like top rail. Though the idea of this back splat had an introduction for English chairs within the Queen Anne period, wooden items that would only to a restricted limit stabilise corner joints (as well as being loose additionally) are an element solely to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which stops around the rounded staves. Every member is round in section or possesses rounded edges—referable maybe to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not comfortable and might have had a plaited form. These chairs needed the sitter to remain stiff and upright; for if too much weight is exerted on the back, the chair has a tendency to fall over. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this era armchairs likely were allowed only for the senior persons, for they were esteemed greatly.
The Chinese folding stool is believed to have been brought to China from the West. It is akin much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a variation in that the top rail is elegantly affixed to the two legs of the stool by means of a curved member, which is usually provided with metal mounts. From a Western viewpoint the resulting effect of both these furniture styles is stylized. The construction and aesthetic parts are combined in a way that is all at once both naïve and refined. The pieced-together appearance is a result of the way that the individual parts do not appear to have been held together by either glue or screws, but were mortised with one another and fixed in its place in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also left its signature on the chair. Works of art project a design of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, with two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between the layers, stitched to bring out a pattern of little pads. The front board and a similar board in the back could be folded after loosening some small iron hooks. In this way the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture when traveling which, at the same time, held the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered design of chair can be seen in engravings of the interiors of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Although this kind of chair is also made in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not believed that the style actually was born in The Netherlands. Generally, the legs of the chair will be smooth, round in section, and of slender shape; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is patently a bourgeois piece of furniture and was crafted in impressive quantities, as evidenced from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which a whole row of those chairs lined up along a wall. The form asserts itself by its elegant proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric framed with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of styles—that is, as progressed in Paris around 1750—conquered most of Europe and was imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The style owes this popularity to a combination of comfort and elegance. The seat conforms to the human body and permits a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Generally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads over the armrests. Smooth transitions are achieved between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are stable, constructed on craftsmanlike methods even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those employ wood of quite thick density; but every member is deeply molded, all extra wood has been cut away, and more expensive examples would be further embellished with highly delicate and decorative carvings. The wood may be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry should be used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; canework is in some cases used rather than upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more differentiated in style than the French. The French taste for stylistic uniformity, which disseminated from the most distinguished circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and was popularised in several parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popular and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper styles of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, indicate that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office chairs in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content