From each of the furniture pieces, the chair may be the primary one. While most of the other forms (apart from the bed) are devised to support objects, the chair supports a human form. The term chair is meant to be regarded here in the widest sense, from stool to throne to complex chairs including a bench and sofa, which might be seen as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not clearly labeled.
The social history of the chair is as interesting as its history as an art and craft. The chair is not simply a physical support and aesthetic object; it is also symbolic of social place. In the past royal courts there were plain connotations between being seated on a chair with arms, on a chair with a back but without arms, and having to make do with a stool. Since the last century, a director’s and/or manager’s chair has risen an identifier of superior dignity, like in democratic government debate the speaker sits on a high-set level.
As its furniture purpose, the chair is used for a number of different forms. There are chairs designed to match man’s age and physical abilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and for his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). In past days there were chairs used for birthing (birth chairs); since the 20th century, there have been chairs to die in (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can make chairs that can be folded up, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern day living has demanded special chairs in automobiles and aircraft. All these chair shapes has been perfected to match to changing human needs. From its unique connection with man, the chair exists to its full purpose only when being utilised. Though it does not make any difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a set of drawers if there might be things inside or not, a chair is really seen and fairly judged with a person utilising it, for chair and sitter need the other. Thus the several parts of the chair have been given names according to the parts of our human parts: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the primary role of the chair is to support our human body, its value is tested firstly for how completely it measures up to this practical role. In the build of the chair, the designer is limited for particular static laws and principal measurements. In these restrictions, however, the chair maker has extensive freedom.
The history of the chair lasted a period of several thousand years. There are civilizations that have created iconic chair types, expressive of the principal object in the spheres of handling and creativity. From such civilisations, particular note needs to be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lifetimes of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the construct of careful design, are today a finding from discoveries made in tombs. One of them is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The original Egyptian chair would have had four legs designed similar to those of a particular animal, a curved seat, leading to a sloping back supported with vertical stretchers. From this design a durable triangular form was made. There appears to be no notable difference in the creation of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical citizens. The only variation exists in the brand of ornamentation, in the particulars of pricey inlays. The Egyptian folding stool probably was crafted for an easily portable seat for soldiers. As a camp stool that kind persevered until much later points. But the stool also was created as the character of a ceremonial seat, its original history as a folding stool ignored or forgotten. This can today be observed, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, crafted in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are in the construction of folding stools but can’t be folded because the seats are formed of wood. The easy manufacture of the folding stool, composed of two frames that spin on metal bolts and support a seat of leather or fabric secured between them, appeared again some time later in the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The better known of this form is the folding stool, crafted out of ashwood, now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The typical Greek chair, the klismos, is found not in any ancient specimen still existing but seen in a large amount of pictorial objects. The better recognised is the klismos seen on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location in outer Athens (c. 410 BC). It is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of them could be displayed. These curving legs were considered to be crafted of bent wood and were therefore subjected to huge pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints joining the legs to the frame of the seat were therefore very stable and were visibly pointed out.
The Romans emulated the Greek chair; designs of casts of seated Romans display designs of a more heavyset and in appearance slightly less intricately constructed klismos. Both features, the light or heavy, were popularised as part of the Classicist time. The klismos influence can be found in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in some types of profound uniqueness within Denmark and Sweden from 1800.
China
The past of the chair in China can not be tracked as far back as the progression of the chair in Egypt and Greece. From the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unbroken collection of sketches and artworks has been kept safe, with images of the interior and outside of Chinese homes and the designs of furniture. Also preserved from the 16th century are a collection of chairs constructed of wood or lacquered wood, that display an astonishing likeness to styles of past chairs.
As in Egypt, there were two iconic chair forms in China: a chair that had four legs and a folding stool. That chair has been seen both with and without arms though always having a square seat and straight stiles (vertical side supports) to firm the back. In one kind, however, the stiles are delicately curved over the arms in order to fit the structure of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of a chairback). Together, the three sections had been mortised in the yoke-like top rail. While the style of the back splat exercised an inspiration for English chairs during the Queen Anne period, wooden sections that could merely to a limited limit embolden corner joints (and then are loose as a result) indicate an element exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which finishes about the rounded staves. Every member is round in section or has rounded edges—acknowledging perhaps to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not comfortable and might have had a plaited form. These chairs demanded of the sitter to be stiff and upright; for when too much pressure is exerted on the back, the chair has a way of toppling. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this period armchairs most likely were reserved for elderly individuals, for they were greatly esteemed.
The Chinese folding stool is thought to have taken to China from the West. It does not differ that much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a variation in that the top rail is intricately fixed to the two legs of the stool by using a curved member, which is generally seen with metal mounts. From a Western point of view the resulting effect of both these furniture forms is stylized. The manufacture and decoration parts are combined in a manner that is simultaneously naïve and refined. The pieced-together appearance is a result of the fact that the individual items do not look to have been fixed by either glue or screws, but are mortised onto one another and locked into place in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also put its mark on the chair. Artworks show a style of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, with two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between the layers, stitched to show up a pattern of small pads. The front board and a related board from the back could be folded after loosening some little iron hooks. Thus the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture for traveling which, at the same era, had the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered kind of chair can be displayed in engravings of the interior of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Although this kind of chair might also be found in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won favour, it is not determined that the innovation actually was instigated in The Netherlands. Typically, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of slim measurements; they are sometimes baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is clearly a bourgeois piece of furniture and was produced in impressive amounts, as can be seen from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which a whole row of these chairs lined up by a wall. The design asserts itself by its harmonious proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of forms—that is, as brought out in Paris around 1750—disseminated over most of Europe and was imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The design owes its popularity to a combination of relaxation and delicacy. The seat suits to the human body and permits a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Normally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are little upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are constructed solidly on craftsmanlike methods despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them are made from wood of quite thick dimensions; but each member is deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been removed, and more upmarket chairs may be further embellished with highly delicate and decorative woodwork. The wood may be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is used for all upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is occasionally used rather than upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more varied in design than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which came from the royal circles in Paris and Versailles within most of France and won favour in several parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became commonly known and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
During the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper products of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, purport that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on executive furniture in Sydney contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content